India’s social media law puts Big Tech’s power into state’s hands, critics say


The logos of mobile apps, Google, Amazon, Facebook, Apple and Netflix, are displayed on a screen in this illustration.

Regis Duvignau | Reuters

India’s new rules for social media is a sign that New Delhi is hardening its stance toward Big Tech, experts told CNBC.

Internet giants like Facebook, Amazon and Google — collectively known as Big Tech — have accrued billions of users on their digital platforms globally. They’ve invested billions of dollars over the years as they see India, a country with over 600 million internet users, as a crucial growth engine for the future.

“I do believe the Indian government has become less accommodative over the years,” said Bhaskar Chakravorti, dean of global business at Tufts University’s The Fletcher School.

To be clear, India is not alone.

Regulators around the world have also ramped up scrutiny on the outsized influence of Silicon Valley’s tech titans. From the United States to Europe and Australia, regulators are tightening the rules to keep Big Tech in check.

Keeping Big Tech in check

Anti-competitive practices from the big tech companies have also earned regulatory scrutiny — particularly moves that are seen as putting Indian firms at a disadvantage, according to Trisha Ray, an associate fellow at the Observer Research Foundation’s (ORF) Technology and Media Initiative.

“Content moderation has also been another point of contention,” Ray said, adding that social media companies have come under fire for not taking down certain kinds of content that the Indian government believes threaten public safety.

Why now?

Chakravorti outlined several reasons why India is becoming less accommodative toward Big Tech.

A big driver is the rise of India’s homegrown platforms such as Reliance Jio, which “benefits from the government taking a more aggressive stance on the US tech companies as it (Jio) looks to develop its own apps and services,” he told CNBC in an email.

Other reasons include the government’s political ambitions, such as Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s push for self-reliance and appeasing the “Hindu religious right,” he said. The landmark “Make In India” policy — which is aimed at reviving India’s manufacturing sector through higher domestic and foreign participation — is another factor, he said.

“Finally, the government increasingly wants to control the media narratives across the country,” Chakravorti said.

“While traditional media is easier to control, social media being user generated and amplified is harder; so it is easy to see why the government wants to exert greater control over the social media companies and set very strong content moderation rules,” he added.

(The new social media rules) caters towards a power, which can be held by government over social media companies, which essentially makes social media companies as a media platform for the state…

Apar Gupta

Executive director, Internet Freedom Foundation

Regulatory scrutiny has increased in recent years around data protection, privacy, election interference and disinformation, Apar Gupta, executive director at the Internet Freedom Foundation, a digital liberties organization in India, told CNBC.

Some of the newer rules have been criticized by digital rights activists and technologists for being too focused on the “political objectives of government in terms of having a greater level of power over social media companies,” he said. They should instead be “serving user interests of privacy, free expression, and a safe online environment,” Gupta added.

Criticism for the law

Will firms comply?

Analysts don’t expect Big Tech to retaliate aggressively to India’s law — like how Google and Facebook responded to Australia’s new media law. So far, none of the companies have to threatened to pull their products and services from the market.

Tandem Research’s Aneja explained that India promises a lucrative market for the internet giants and their emphasis will likely be to maintain access and presence.

“I think the bigger problem is going to be for the smaller companies to be able to comply,” she said.

Vehicles travel past an information technology park in the Electronic City area of Bengaluru, India, on Friday, March 5, 2021.

Dhiraj Singh | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Aneja said India’s institutional and regulatory capacity to implement reforms is still relatively weak. “Too often, the blame is laid at the feet of the tech companies,” she said, adding that India needs to do more in terms of enforcing its rules before any meaningful changes take place.

India also does not have a data privacy law though there is a bill that is currently still in parliament.

Tufts University’s Chakravorti said there is unlikely to be a head-on confrontation between Big Tech and the Indian government, as they are set to be under pressure back in the U.S. in the coming years.

Those companies “will not have the leverage and the managerial will to fight battles on so many fronts. In the near term, I think the Indian government will win,” he said.



Source link

Share via
Copy link